D Veeranjaneyulu vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Case Status:Dismissed
Order Date:7 Feb 2024
CNR:APHC010144792022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Listed On:

7 Feb 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10563 OF 2099

Between:

D. Veeranjaneyulu. S/o. D Eswaraiah. Aged about 35 years, Occ: Contractor, R/ d. 5-102, Taduru, Chanugondia, Kurriool District, Pincode- 518464.

...PETITIONER

AND

    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Department of Irrigation (Water Resources Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District.
    1. The Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
    1. The Executive Engineer, M.l.Works Division, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
    1. The Chief Executive Officer, AP CFMS Office, 6th Floor, C-Block, Anjaneya Towers, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District.

...RESPONDENTS

praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue <sup>a</sup> WR/T OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding 'the payment of net balance amount Rs.5,97,559/- vide M Book number even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or 969

orks i.e., Desilting and jungle clearance of Gaddavanka(Vagu-l) (from /ch.Krp.0.00 to Km 2.100) near Kothalpurju (v) Dhone (M) of Kurnool " District, Vide Agreement No. 1845 /2018-19 dated 03.11.2018 is qu5|tioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to consider <sup>f</sup> payment of amounts of Rs.5,97,559/- vide M Book number <sup>969</sup> wit interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith.

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2022

/

/

Petition under Section <sup>151</sup> CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be to direct the respondents to consider for payment of amount of Rs.5,97,559/- vide M Book number 969 with interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e. Desilting and jungle clearance of Gaddavanka(Vagu-l) (from ch.Km.0.00 to Km 2.100) near Kothaburju (v) Dhone (M) of Kurnool District, Vide Agreement No.1845 /2018-19, dated 03.11.2018, forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. BATHALA RAMESH

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, <sup>3</sup> & 4: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEVELOPMENT

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. <sup>2</sup> & 5: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER

the HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

ORDER;

i

WRIT PETITION NO. 10563 OF 2022

  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

\

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, on oral instructions submitted that respondent authorities paid the total due amount claimed by the petitioner. 2.

  1. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents paid the principal amount, but not paid the interest as claimed by the petitioner.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader that the principal amount was already paid as claimed by the petitioner and also the contention of the learned Government Pleader that the further 4. claim of interest for delayed payment can be agitated by way of initiation of separate/fresh legal proceedings is also valid and sustainable.

  1. In view of the facts and circumstances and for the reasons stated above, the present Writ Petition is infructuous, granting liberty to the petitioner to claim differential amount/withheld amount or interest amount, if any, by way of initiation of fresh/separate legal proceedings in accordai^f^e with law. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

Sd/- K. KASI RAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

    1. One CC to Sri. Bathala Ramesh, Advocate [OPUC]
    1. Two CCs to GP for Irrigation & Command Area Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
    1. Two CCs to GP for Finance & Planning, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
    1. Three CD Copies.
  • gi

HIGH COURT DATED:07/02/2024

ORDER

WP.No.10563 of 2022

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(3) - 7 Feb 2024

Final Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 7 Feb 2024

Final Order

Viewing

Order(1) - 19 Apr 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 19 Apr 2022

Interim Order

Click to view