V.Mohan Reddy vs. The Commissioner

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble K Manmadha Rao
Case Status:Dismissed
Order Date:22 Aug 2024
CNR:APHC010137302012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble K Manmadha Rao

Listed On:

22 Aug 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUS TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 34548 OF 2012

Between:

V.Mohan Reddy, S/o.V.Ramana Reddy, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Business R/o.D.No.472,Bit-I,Mini bypass raod, Ramalingapuram, Nellore.

...PETITIONER

AND

    1. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, at Dharmikabhavan, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad.
    1. The Asst.Commissioner,Endowments Department, Nellore District,at Nellore.
    1. Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, Mulapet, Nellore. Rep.by its Executive officer.
    1. The Cornmissioner, Municipal Corporation of Nellore.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 & 3 herein, its subordinates in entering into and demolishing the Compound wall of the petitioner land forcibly, high handedly, Without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of Article 14, 21 and Article 300-A of constitution of India. Consequently direct the respondents No.2 & 3 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner land of 110 ankanams in Plot

No.11,12,13,8i14 in lay out of L.P.No.168/84, in Sy.No.444, Nellore Bit-1 Area, Ward No. 16, Rama Linga Puram, Nellore.

I,A. NO: <sup>2</sup> OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 43907 OF 2012)

r

Petition under Section <sup>151</sup> CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 & <sup>3</sup> herein, not to interfere with possession of the petitioner in the land of 110 ankanams in Plots No. 11,12, 13, 14 in lay out of L.P.No. 168/84, in Sy.No.444, Nellore Bit-1 Area, Ward No. 16, Rama Linga Puram, Nellore.

I.A. NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2012(WVr/IP. NO: 3959 OF 2012)

  • 1, The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh,at Dharmikabhavan,Boggulakunta, Hyderabad.
    1. The Asst.Comrnissioner,Endowments Department, Nellore District,at Nellore.
    1. Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, Mulapet,Nellore. Rep.by its Executive officer.
  • 4, The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Nellore.

...PETITIONERS

V.Mohan Reddy, S/o.V.Ramana Reddy, Aged about 56 years,Occ: Business R/o.D.No.472,Bit-1,Mini bypass raod, Rainalingapuram, Nellore.

...RESPONDENT

Petition under Section <sup>151</sup> CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order passed in WPMP.No.43907/2012 dt: 06/11/2012 in WP No. 34548/2012.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent : V T M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS Counsel for the Respondent : B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL $MC)$

The Court made the following : ORDER

APHC010137302012

t

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310]

THURSDAY JHE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST <sup>j</sup> TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE <sup>K</sup> MANMADHA RAO /

WRIT PETITION NO: 34548/2012

Between:

V.mohan Reddy, ...PETITIONER

AND

The Commissioner Endowments Department and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

  1. V <sup>T</sup> M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS

2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

3.B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC)

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr D.Sudarshan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appears online through video conferencing and submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed $2.$ as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- U.SRI DEVI ASSISTANT, REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

To,

    1. One CC to SRI. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA Advocate [OPUC]
    1. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
    1. One CC to SRI. V T M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS Advocate [OPUC]
    1. One CC to SRI. B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC) Advocate [OPUC]
    1. Three CD Copies

KM

HIGH COURT

DATED:22/08/2024

ORDER

WP.No.34548 of 2012

DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS