V.Mohan Reddy vs. The Commissioner
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble K Manmadha Rao
Listed On:
22 Aug 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUS TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 34548 OF 2012
Between:
V.Mohan Reddy, S/o.V.Ramana Reddy, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Business R/o.D.No.472,Bit-I,Mini bypass raod, Ramalingapuram, Nellore.
...PETITIONER
AND
-
- The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, at Dharmikabhavan, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad.
-
- The Asst.Commissioner,Endowments Department, Nellore District,at Nellore.
-
- Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, Mulapet, Nellore. Rep.by its Executive officer.
-
- The Cornmissioner, Municipal Corporation of Nellore.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 & 3 herein, its subordinates in entering into and demolishing the Compound wall of the petitioner land forcibly, high handedly, Without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of Article 14, 21 and Article 300-A of constitution of India. Consequently direct the respondents No.2 & 3 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner land of 110 ankanams in Plot
No.11,12,13,8i14 in lay out of L.P.No.168/84, in Sy.No.444, Nellore Bit-1 Area, Ward No. 16, Rama Linga Puram, Nellore.
I,A. NO: <sup>2</sup> OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 43907 OF 2012)
r
Petition under Section <sup>151</sup> CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 & <sup>3</sup> herein, not to interfere with possession of the petitioner in the land of 110 ankanams in Plots No. 11,12, 13, 14 in lay out of L.P.No. 168/84, in Sy.No.444, Nellore Bit-1 Area, Ward No. 16, Rama Linga Puram, Nellore.
I.A. NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2012(WVr/IP. NO: 3959 OF 2012)
- 1, The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh,at Dharmikabhavan,Boggulakunta, Hyderabad.
-
- The Asst.Comrnissioner,Endowments Department, Nellore District,at Nellore.
-
- Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, Mulapet,Nellore. Rep.by its Executive officer.
- 4, The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Nellore.
...PETITIONERS
V.Mohan Reddy, S/o.V.Ramana Reddy, Aged about 56 years,Occ: Business R/o.D.No.472,Bit-1,Mini bypass raod, Rainalingapuram, Nellore.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Section <sup>151</sup> CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order passed in WPMP.No.43907/2012 dt: 06/11/2012 in WP No. 34548/2012.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent : V T M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS Counsel for the Respondent : B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL $MC)$
The Court made the following : ORDER
APHC010137302012
t
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310]
THURSDAY JHE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST <sup>j</sup> TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE <sup>K</sup> MANMADHA RAO /
WRIT PETITION NO: 34548/2012
Between:
V.mohan Reddy, ...PETITIONER
AND
The Commissioner Endowments Department and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
- V <sup>T</sup> M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
3.B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr D.Sudarshan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appears online through video conferencing and submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed $2.$ as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- U.SRI DEVI ASSISTANT, REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
-
- One CC to SRI. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
-
- One CC to SRI. V T M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS Advocate [OPUC]
-
- One CC to SRI. B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC) Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Three CD Copies
KM
HIGH COURT
DATED:22/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.34548 of 2012