Kolli Kiran vs. Prl Secy
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble K Manmadha Rao
Listed On:
25 Apr 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
APHC010136602016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 31441/2016
Between:
Kolli Kiran, Krishna Dist & 4 Others and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Prl Secy Dept Of Home Legislative Affairs Hyd 3 Oth and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.V R N PRASHANTH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.4026/K RAJYA LAKSHMI
2.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
This writ petition is filed declaring the action of the 3 rd respondent in summoning the petitioner and his parents to Reddygudem Police Station, as illegal and arbitrary.
-
Heard Mr.L.Sai Manoj Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.V.R.N.Prasanth, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents as well as Ms.Swarna Seshu, learned counsel representing Ms.K.Rajya Lakshmi, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent.
-
On hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home furnished a copy of Written Instructions issued by Station House Officer, Reddygudem Police Station, Krishna district, dated 22.09.2016 and submits that the 3rd respondent never detained the petitioners in the police station and never threatened them to get the matter settled and no complaint was received against the petitioners herein.
-
Learned counsel for the unofficial respondent submits that the family disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent are redressed.
-
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not refute to the above submissions.
-
In view of the submissions made by all the counsel and upon perusing the written instructions issued by respondent police, this Court is of the view that, nothing survives in the present writ petition for any further adjudication and hence, the writ petition is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J
25 th April, 2024 BMS