B.Rajeswari vs. The State Of A.P.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Panchayat Raj)
Before:
Hon'ble Cheekati Manavendranath Roy
Listed On:
15 Apr 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE : PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH RO'
WRIT PETITION NO: 7711 OF 2021
Between:
-
- B.Rajeswari, W/o.N.Srinivasulu, Age- 37 years, Occ-House wife, R/o.D.No.13-3-58, Srinivasa Nagar, Anantapur Town, Anantapur District.
-
- B.Gowri Priya, W/o.Y.Venkatesulu, Age- 29 years, Occ- House wife, Rio D.No.13-3-58, Srinivasa Nagar, Anantapur Town, Anantapur District.
...Petitioners
AND
-
- The State of A.P, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist.
-
- The District Panchayat Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District.
-
- The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Anantapur Rural Mandal, Anantapur District.
-
- The Prasannayapalli Grampanachayat, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Prasannayapalli, Anantapur Rural Mandal and District.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings Rek.No.29/2020 dt-22-02-2021 of the 4<sup>th</sup> respondent as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, without jurisdiction, in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Art.14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.334-1A and 334-2A an extent of Ac.0.11 3/4 cents of Anantapur Town and Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.334-1A and 334-2A an extent of Ac.0.11 3/4 cents of Anantapur Town and Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice, pending disposal of WP 7711 of 2021, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Order of the High Court dated 06.04.2021 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S D Gowd, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Sri V Vinod K Reddy, Standing Counsel for respondents, the Court made the following.
ORDER:
"At the request of Learned Standing Counsel for 4<sup>th</sup> respondent Gram Panchayat, for filing counter-affidavit, post the matter after 2 (Two) weeks.
Interim order granted earlier is extended till then."
//TRUE COPY//
$\mathbf{F}$
Sd/-B.NarsingaRao ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OF MCER
To,
- One CC to Sri. S D Gowd, Advocate [OPUC]
-
- One CC to Sri V Vinod K Reddy, Standing Counsel [OPUC]
-
- One spare copy.
MSB
HIGH COURT
CMR,J
DATED:19/04/2021
POST THE MATTER AFTER TWO (2) WEEKS
ORDER
WP.No.7711 of 2021
INTERIM DIRECTION
$\overline{G}^{\pm}$