B.Rajeswari vs. The State Of A.P.

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Cheekati Manavendranath Roy
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:6 Apr 2021
CNR:APHC010132282021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Admission (Panchayat Raj)

Before:

Hon'ble Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

Listed On:

6 Apr 2021

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE : PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY WRIT PETITION NO: 7711 OF 2021

Between:

    1. B.Rajeswari, W/o.N.Srinivasulu, Age- 37 years, Occ-House wife, R/o.D.No.13-3-58, Srinivasa Nagar, Anantapur Town, Anantapur District.
    1. B.Gowri Priya, W/o.Y.Venkatesulu, Age- 29 years, Occ- House wife, Rio .D.No.13-3-58, Srinivasa Nagar, Anantapur Town, Anantapur District.

Petitioners

г 3163

AND

    1. The State of A.P, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist.
    1. The District Panchayat Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District.
    1. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Anantapur Rural Mandal, Anantapur District.
    1. The Prasannayapalli Grampanachayat, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Prasannayapalli, Anantapur Rural Mandal and District.

Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings Rek.No.29/2020 dt-22-02-2021 of the 4<sup>th</sup> respondent as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, without jurisdiction, in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Art.14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.334-1A and 334-2A an extent of Ac.0.11 3/4 cents of Anantapur Town and Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.334-1A and 334-2A an extent of Ac.0.11 3/4 cents of Anantapur Town and Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice, pending disposal of WP 7711 of 2021, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI S D GOWD Advocate for the Petitioner, and of SRI V VINOD K REDDY, Standing Counsel for respondent, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

"Print the name of Sri V.Vinod K Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent – Gram Panchayat.

Sri V. Vinod K Reddy, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent – Gram Panchayat and requested time to seek instructions.

Post the matter on 15.04.2021.

Meanwhile, there shall be interim direction to the respondents not to take any coercive steps to demolish the boundary wall in the disputed site, till the next date of hearing".

Sd/-T.Madhavi

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

  • To,
      1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, State of A.P, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist.
      1. The District Panchayat Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District.
      1. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Anantapur Rural Mandal, Anantapur District.
      1. The Panchayat Secretary, Prasannayapalli Grampanachayat, Prasannayapalli, Anantapur Rural Mandal and District. (by RPAD)
      1. One CC to SRI. S D GOWD Advocate [OPUC]
      1. One CC to SRI V VINOD K REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC]
      1. One spare copy

$\mathcal{A} \in \mathbb{R}^2$ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \math$ $\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{A})$ $\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} \mid \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} }$ $\mathcal{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$ $\mathcal{L} = \left{ \begin{array}{l} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \ \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L$ $\mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L}$ $\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} = \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} \end{aligned}$ $\label{eq:1} \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} = \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} \end{aligned}$ $\mathcal{A} = {1,2,3,4}$ $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$

HIGH COURT

CMRJ

DATED:06/04/2021

POST THE MATTER ON 15-04-2021

ORDER

WP.No.7711 of 2021

INTERIM DIRECTION