Muthyala Kalyan @ Muthyala Sai Kalyan vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble K Sreenivasa Reddy
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:16 Mar 2023
CNR:APHC010127302023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Admission

Before:

Hon'ble K Sreenivasa Reddy

Listed On:

16 Mar 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

(SHOWCAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) 7:r. lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAYOF MARCH 7` ll^/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1946 OF 2023

Between:

  • 1 I 2M4utyheya:i: , Koa:yc:g u?eMrv:st:ya!;oiKa: nKda:yaMni{t!?-i)aJSa/ op-aMn'aNgaaie£:aa:a lR2ehO cArgoesds Street, Ongole -523 001 Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.
    1. Byreddy Venugopal, S/o.Sri B.Subba Rao (A-4) Aged 46 years, Occ:Poultry R/o.Srinivasa Colony, Ongole Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.
    1. Pilli Rajesh @ Pilli Rajesh Kumar, S/o.P.Satyanarayana (A-6) Aged 40 years, Occ:Business R/o.H.No.6-276, Venkateswara Colony Ongole, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.
    1. Bhupathi Ramesh, (A-7) S/o.T.N.Bhupathi Aged 48 years, Occ.-Business R/o.D.No.27-47-720, 8th Lane, Balaram Colony, Ongole, Prakasam District Andhra Pradesh.
    1. Katari Mani Kumar @ Marturi Mani Kumar, (A-8) S/o.M.Mallikarjuna Rao Aged 28 Years, Occ:Business R/o.D.No.7-605/ 1, 5th Lane, Gandhinagar Ongole -523 001, Prakasam District Ahdhra Pradesh
    1. Chittem Prasad @ Chittem Venkata Durga Prasad Rao, (A-9) S/ o.Ch.Bhaskara Rao Aged 52 years, Occ:Business R/o.D.No.8-476, Nirmal Nagar Ongole, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh
    1. Rayapati Aruna, (A-10) W/ o. Chiranjeevi Aged 32 years, Occ:Housewife R/o.Ongole, Prakasam District Andhra Pradesh
    1. Palla Pramila @ Palla Prameela Rani, (A-ll) W/o.P.Bala Subrahmanyam Aged 35 years, Occ: Housewife R/o.H.No.27-45-225/7, 3rd Lane, Kammapalem, Ongole, Prakasam District Andhra Pradesh.
    1. A. Usha Rani, (A-12) W/o.A.Srinivasa Rao Aged 31 years, Occ:Housewife R/o.D.No.3-48, S.N.Padu Endluru, Prakasam District, AP
  • 10.A. Vasavi, (A-13) W/o.A.Maesh Kumar Aged 32 years, Occ:Housewife R/o.D.No.35-3-698/9, Ongole Prakasam District, Andhra P

Petitioners/A-3, A-4, A-6, A-7,

A-8, A-9, A-10, A-ll, A-12 & A-13

AND

    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Station House Officer Ongole Taluq Police Station Ongole, Prakasam District Rep.by Public Prosecutor High Court, Amaravathi.
    1. L. Sampath Kumar, Sub.Inspector Ongole Taluq Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District, AP.

Respondents

WHEREAS the Petitioners/Accused above named through their Advocate Sri TURAGA SAI SURYA presented this Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in FIR NO.680 of 2022, Dt. 1.6-10-2022 on the file of the Station House Officer, Ongole Taluq Police Station, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh and quash the same in so far as the Petitioners/ A-3, A-4, A-6, A-7, A-8, A-9, A-10, A-ll, A-12 and A-13 are concerned as the same is illegal and abuse of process of law;

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri TURAGA SAI SURYA Advocate for the Petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent No.1, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No.2 herein to show cause as to why this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted,

You viz:

L. Sampath Kumar, Sub.Inspector Ongole Taluq Police Station Ongole, Prakasam District, AP.

are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted within four weeks.

The Court made the following Order:

tfLearned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice for respondent No.1 and seeks time to get instructions in the matter.

Issue notice to respondent No.2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to respondent No.2 by RPAD and file proof of service in the Registry within a period of three (3) weeks.

List the matter after four (4) weeks."

Sd/-G. SRINIVAS REDDY ASSISTANT SECTION OFFICER

To]

  1. The Station House Officer, Ongole Taluq Police Stat'lon Ongole, Prakasam District.

//TRUE COPY//

    1. L. Sampath Kumar, Sub.Inspector Ongole Taluq Police Station Ongole, Prakasam District, AP (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)
    1. One CC to SRI. TURAGA SAI SURYA Advocate [OPUC]
    1. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) [OUT]
    1. Onesparecopy

ER

HIGH COURT

SRK, J

DATED: 16/03/2023

LIST THE MATTER AFTER FOUR (4) WEEKS

NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.2

CRLP.No.1946 of 2023