Manne Dheerendranath Choudary @ Nani vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh

Judge:Hon'ble Harinath.N

Case Status:Unknown Status

Order Date:11 Mar 2025

CNR:APHC010126282025

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Get a certified copy of this order

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

SI.<br>No.	DATE	<b>ORDER</b>
$01.$	11.03.2025	<u>HN, J</u>
		The learned counsel for the petitioners<br>submits that the petitioners are arraigned as<br>Accused Nos.1 and 2, in C.C.No.154 of 2024, on<br>file Ramabhadhrapuram Police Station,<br>the<br>Vizianagaram District, for the alleged offences<br>under Section(s) $318(4)$ , $336(3)$ , $338$ , $340(2)$ read<br>with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,<br>2023 (for short, "BNS").<br>It is submitted that the allegations, even as<br>per the compliant, would not imply that the<br>petitioners have committed forgery of a purported<br>document. Even as per the complaint, the de<br>facto complainant has stated that a document<br>signed by them from the USA was sent via<br>whatsapp to the petitioners.<br>The learned counsel for the petitioners<br>further submits that the complaint is vague and<br>appears to have been filed out of vengeance.<br>It is further submitted that the complaint was<br>filed solely based on an apprehension when the
		$2nd$ respondent was in India.

	Considering the submission, there shall be a
	stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.154 of
	2024,<br>on<br>the<br>file<br>Ramabhadhrapuram<br>Police
	Station, Vizianagaram District.
	In the meanwhile, the learned counsel for
	the petitioners is permitted to take out personal
	notice on the 2nd respondent by RPAD and file
	proof of service in the Registry
	Post the matter on 16.04.2025.

	_____<br>HN, J
	NKA