(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATION (Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 640 OF 2021

Between:

Maddi Kamalanabham, S/o. late M. Latchayya, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Senior Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company, R/o. H.No. 15-15-5/1, Krishna Nagar, Öfficial colony, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam.

.... Petitioner

AND

• 1. R Narasimha Murthy, Tahsildar, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Andhra Pradesh.
• Satyam Dora, Village Revenue Officer, Darapalem Village $2. Mr.$ Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

....Respondents / Contemnors

Whereas the petitioner has presented under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the above case through his counsel Sri K B Ramanna Dora, praying the High Court to punish the Contemnors / respondents herein, for their willful and intentional disobedience of the orders dated 21-12-2020 passed by the High Court in WP No.24434 of 2020, in the interest of justice.

Whereas the said case coming on for orders as to admission on this day and whereas the High Court, upon perusing the affidavit filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K B Ramanna Dora, Advocate for the petitioner, directed issuance of notice before admission to the respondents herein, to show cause as to why in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, the said case should not be admitted.

Therefore, you namely;

• 1. R Narasimha Murthy, Tahsildar, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Mr. Satyam Dora, Village Revenue Officer, Darapalem Village Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

be and hereby are directed to show cause, as to why the contempt case should not be admitted, either appearing in person or through Advocate, duly instructed on 23-04-2021, to which date the case stands posted for hearing, failing wherein the said case will be heard and determined ex-parte.

Sd/-U.SivaLeela DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To

• 1. The District Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, to return to this Court before 23-04-2021).
• 2. R Narasimha Murthy, Tahsildar, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Andhra Pradesh.

3. Mr. Satyam Dora, Village Revenue Officer, Darapalem Village Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District(Addressee Nos. 2 and 3 By $\mathsf{RPAD} - \mathsf{along\ with\ a\ copy\ of\ petition\ and\ affidavit).}$

$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$

$\overline{a}$

$\overline{\mathbf{t}}$

• 4. Two Spare copies.
• $\mathbf{P}\mathbf{R}$

HIGH COURT

NJS,J

DATE: 31.03.2021

NOTE: POST ON 23-04-2021

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

CC. NO. 640 OF 2021