K Madhan Mohan vs. The State Of Ap
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble R Raghunandan Rao
Listed On:
3 May 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.6246 of 2023
ORDER:
The petitioner herein had undertaken various contract works under Neeru Chettu Programme, under various agreements. Earnest money deposits and security deposits were deducted in the course of payment of running bills. These amounts were to be returned upon completion of the contract. The contract stipulated that the earnest money deposit and security deposit would be returned after a lapse of 3+24 months.
-
In the present case, the petitioner had completed his contracts within the stipulated time. However, the earnest money deposits and security deposits are not being released. Aggrieved by the non-release of these funds, the petitioner has approached this Court, by way of the present writ petition.
-
The learned Government Pleader for Irrigation, on instructions, submits that the earnest money deposits and security deposits are to be released only upon finalisation of the bills of the contractors and as the bills of the petitioner have not yet been finalised, the deposits were not being released.
-
The learned Government Pleader would contend, on the terms of the agreement that the EMD and security deposits were not paid by the petitioner directly. They were deducted from the running bills. He would further submit that the terms of the agreement stipulate that the said deposits are to be retained by the employer for a period of 3+24 months which would mean that the employer is entitled to retain the deposits for a period of 27 months from the date of deduction.
-
A perusal of the agreement shows that the period of 3+24 months has been fixed as defect liability period. This would mean that the period of 27 months is to be calculated from the date of completion of the work. In such circumstances, the said period of 27 months has elapsed long back as the contracts have been completed within the stipulated time. In such circumstances, the question of the deposits being retained by the respondents would not arise.
-
Consequently, the writ petition is allowed directing the respondents to return the security deposits and earnest money deposits retained by the respondents, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
3 rd May, 2023 Js.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.6246 of 2023
3 rd May, 2023
Js.