Hanumantu Vajjula Sesharatnam vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble K Sreenivasa Reddy
Listed On:
15 Mar 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAII
WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH ll^/O THOUSAND AND T^/ENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1878 OF 2O23
Betwee n :
- /,/ /
Smt.Hanumantu Vajjula Sesharatnam, W/o. Late Varahalarao, aged 69 years Occ. House wife, R/o. H No. 4-1, Narsayyapeta, Kirlampudi Mandalam, East Godavari District
Petitioner/Accused No.2
h|'\
[3327]
AND
-
- The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Through SHO, Patamata PS, Vijayawada City Rep by 'lts Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravathi
-
- Hanumantharajjula Kavitha, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, aged 30 years, Occ. House wife, R/o. FF-3, 2nd Floor,m Magalrajusetti towers, Ganesh Temple Road Ganesh Temple street,.Nidamanuru village, Vijayawada Rural, NTR District.
RespondenVDe facto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in Crl'me no.1469/2022 on the file of SHO, Patamata PS, Vijayawada city against the petitioner/ accused no.2
lANO: 2OF 2O23
petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C,praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings including the arrest of the petitioner/ accused no.2 in Crime no. 1469/2022 on the file of SHO, Patamata PS, Vijayawada city, Pending disposal of CRLP 1878 of 2023, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on fc,r hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri E S R Prasad Advocate for the Petitioner, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following
ORDER
ff Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor fakes notice on behalf of lSt Respondent and seeks time to get instructions,
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice to the 2nd Respondent I?y Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due and file proof of service within a period of three (3) weeks.
Police are directed to conduct investigation by following the procedure contemplated under Section 41-A Cr.P.C scrupulously as per the guidelines laid down under Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another<sup>1</sup>.
Sd/- M. SRINIVAS
SECTION OFFICER
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
$\blacktriangle$
For A
$\mathcal{L}^{(1)}(\mathcal{M})$
Post after eight (8) weeks."
//TRUE COPY//
To,
-
- SHO, Patamata PS, Vijayawada City
-
- Hanumantharajjula Kavitha, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, aged 30 years, Occ. House wife, R/o. FF-3, 2nd Floor,m Magalrajusetti towers, Ganesh Temple Road Ganesh Temple street, Nidamanuru village, Vijayawada Rural, NTR (by RPAD)
-
- One CC to Sri E S R Prasad Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT]
-
- One spare copy
RVK
HIGH COURT
$\text{SRK}, \textbf{J}$
DATED: 15/03/2023
POST AFTER EIGHT (8) WEEKS
ORDER
CRLP.No.1878 of 2023
DIRECTION