The State Of Andhra Pradesh vs. N Suryanarayana Reddy
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Subba Reddy Satti
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:10 Mar 2023
CNR:APHC010114702023
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Mines And Industries)
Before:
Hon'ble K Suresh Reddy
Listed On:
10 Mar 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No.: W.P. No.5881 of 2023
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.No | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
---|---|---|---|
2. | 10.03.2023 | VS, J | |
W.P. No.5881 of 2023 | |||
Learned Government Pleader for Roads & | |||
Buildings is directed to take out personal notice | |||
to all the respondents returnable within a period | |||
of two (2) weeks. | |||
Learned<br>Government<br>Pleader<br>is<br>also | |||
directed to file a memo to that extent. | |||
Post the matter after four (4) weeks. | |||
________<br>VS, J<br>I.A. No.1 of 2023 | |||
The present writ petition is filed challenging | |||
the award passed by the 3rd respondent in Case | |||
No.21C/IFC/2020/1228, dated 29.06.2020, on | |||
the file of the A.P. Micro and Small Enterprises | |||
Facilitation Council at Vijayawada. | |||
Heard<br>Sri<br>C.<br>Suman,<br>learned<br>Special | |||
Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the | |||
learned<br>Government<br>Pleader<br>for<br>Roads<br>& |
Buildings. | |
---|---|
During the course of argument, learned | |
Special Government Pleader have argued that in | |
pursuance of the award they have already paid | |
the admitted amount of Rs.24,46,61,866/-, but, | |
however, their grievance is only with regard to the | |
interest portion awarded by the 3rd respondent. | |
Learned<br>Special<br>Government<br>Pleader | |
brought to the notice of this Court that the works | |
allotted to the respondents does not involve any | |
supply and cannot be treated as Work Contracts | |
as ordered by the 3rd respondent in the said | |
award, and also relied upon a judgment in W.P. | |
No.27670 of 2021 and batch wherein this Court | |
under<br>similar<br>circumstances<br>by<br>referring<br>to | |
various case laws held that the Act 27 of 2016 | |
could not apply to the work contracts. | |
In view of the submissions made by the | |
learned Special Government Pleader, this Court | |
feels it appropriate to stay the award passed by | |
the<br>3rd<br>respondent<br>in<br>Case | |
No.21C/IFC/2020/1228, dated 29.06.2020, on | |
the file of the A.P. Micro and Small Enterprises | |
Facilitation Council at Vijayawada, only to the | |
extent of interest portion, for a period of eight (8) | |
weeks. | |
________<br>VS, J | |
KGR/TVN | |
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search