Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec.' 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 14.10.2022 passed in I.A.No. ¹ of 2022 in W.P.No.31102 of 2022 by the Lordships SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH.

Between:

L

M/s.Sai Vishnu Constructions, Rep. by Its Managing Partner, E. RadhaKrishna, S/o, Prasada Rao, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Contractor, R/o. D.No. 4-140, 2nd Floor, Plot No.514, Vijayawada, N.T.R District.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. Vivek Yadav, Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Rep. by its Commissioner, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. CH.Dhanunjaya, The Superintending Engineer (H and B), APCRDA, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. S.S.Rawath, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

4. Sri Lakshmi, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, / • Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi '•-W ...RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS ' Pm.'Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. POLANKI ANAND SURYA

Counsel for the Respondents; SRI. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY

The Court made the following: ORDER

Jk.

fe:

try

APHC010097242023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3332]

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI I /

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1306/2023

Between:

f

...PETITIONER M/s.sal Vishnu Constructions

AND

Vivek Yadav and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. POLANKI ANAND SURYA

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1.KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY

ZKASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY

3.ASHOK RAM V

4.CSUMON

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of orders dated 14.10.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31102/2022.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the respondent authorities have complied with the orders dated 14.10.2022 passed by this Court in

required to be pessed in the W.P.No.31102/2022 and hence, no further orders are contempt case.

Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

/action officer

//TRUE COPY//

To,

\

• 1. Vivek Yadav, Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Rep. by its Commissioner, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. CH.Dhanunjaya, The Superintending Engineer (H and B), APCRDA, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. S.S.Rawath, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
• 4. Sri Lakshmi, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi
• 5. One CC to SRI. POLANKi ANAND SURYA Advocate [OPUC] ^r'OneC^C to SRI. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 7. Three C.D.Copies nm

ORDER CC.No.1306 of 2023

CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED