Abhishek Agarwal vs. Directorate Of Enforcement
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Listed On:
10 Jul 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
APHC010092292022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3396]
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NOS: 1471, 1473, 1474, 1475 & 1620 of 2022
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1471/2022
Between:
Abhishek Agarwal ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
Directorate of Enforcement and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D )
2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1473/2022
Between:
Ranabir Agarwal ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
Directorate of Enforcement and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D )
2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1474/2022
AND
Between:
Uma Agarwal, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
Directorate of Enforcement and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Others
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D ) 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1475/2022
Between:
Anil Kumar Agarwal, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
Directorate of Enforcement and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D )
2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1620/2022
Between:
Kuppam Venkata Prasad ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND Directorate of Enforcement and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.N SASIKALA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D ) 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER:
These Criminal Petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, "Cr.P.C.") have been filed by the Petitioners, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in F.No.ECIR/HYZO/12/2014/318, F.No.ECIR/HYZO/12/2014/319, F.No. ECIR/HYZO/12/2014/324, F.No.ECIR/HYZO/12/2014/325 and F.No.
ECIR/HYZO/12/2014/320 respectively, issued by the 1st Respondent under Sub-Sections 2 and 3 of Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
-
Head Sri P.Adhitya Harsha Vardhan, learned counsel representing Pillix Law Firm for the Petitioners and Sri Josyula Bhaskar Rao, learned Standing Counsel for E.D., for Respondent No.1.
-
Ms. D.Prasanna Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State/Respondent No.2 is in attendance.
-
Learned Standing counsel for E.D. would submit that they have filed a petition before the IV Additional District Court, Visakhapatnam, for closure of the case.
-
Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the same, petitions may be disposed of.
-
In that view, these Criminal Petitions are disposed of, since relief has become infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 10-07-2024 PND