IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

: PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

IA No. 3 OF 2022 $\mathsf{IN}$ CRL.P NO: 1378 OF 2022

Between:

• 1. Bhukya Veeranna, S/o Bhukya Lakshmana, Aged 38 years, Occ Lorry Driver R/o Dootya Thanda, Mahaboobad, Jangligonda
• 2. Tallapaneni Koteswara Rao, S/o Kotaiah, Aged 52 years, Occ Lorry Owner, R/O D.No 15-2-107/2, Gurramvaripalem, Kandukur, Prakasam Dist.
• 3. Muttineni Venkateswara Rao, S/o Pullaiah, Aged 52 years, Occ Rice Business, No 502, Surya Towers, North Janathapeta, Pedapavanipeta, Kavali, Nellore Dist

Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, though Station House Officer, Atkuru Police Station, Vijayawada city, Krishna District

Respondent

2. Venkata Rao Boddu, S/o Nagabhushan, Aged 35 years, Occ Revenue Inspector of Gannavaram, Gannavaram, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

Respondent/Defacto-Complainant

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S V S PRASADA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Crl.P, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders dated: 01.04.2022 in Criminal Petition No: 1378 of 2022, pending disposal of CRL.P No.1378 of 2022, on the file of the High Court. IA NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in the C.C. No.160 of 2021 on the file of XI Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate Cum Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gannavaram, Krishna District, including the appearance of the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3, pending disposal of CRLP No.1378 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.

The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order. (The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case).

application. expiry of the six (6) months, it is deemed appropriate to allow the present insisting that there should be an order of extension of interim orders after learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that the learned Magistrate is four (4) weeks. Such an interpretation is not correct. Be that as it may, as the sfter four (4) weeks, the order is being interpreted that it was granted only for granted without any specific time limit, as the matter was directed to be posted in the Order dated 01.04.2022 stay of all further proceedings have been A. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that though. Perused the averments made in the affidavit filed in the average of the

weeks." (8) the petitioners/A of f.A/sranotitieq off the period of eight (8) cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gannavaram, Krishna District, including the C.C.No.160 of 2021 on the file of the XI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-Hence, there shall be interim stay of all further proceedings in

$\overline{4}$ RARTRIDER TNATRIRRA SA/- G. HELA NAIDU

IITRUE COPY/I

SECTION OFFICER $For$ $\circ$ T

• Gannavaram, Krishna District 1. The XI Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate Cum Principal Junior Civil Judge,
• District 2. The Station House Officer, Atkuru Police Station, Vijayawada city, Krishna
• One CC to Sri S V S Prasada Rao Advocate [OPUC]
• 4. Two CC's to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Amaravati[OUT]
• One spare copy $G$

$dS$

НІЄН СОПЯТ

rsrn

DATED: 22/09/2022

OKDEK

CRL.P.No.1378 of 2022 NI IN No. 3 OF 2022

YATS MIRSTNI

119 001 505<br>119 001 505