(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATION

MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 368 OF 2022

Between:

Balaga Dhanunjaya Rao, S/o Late Kasavavayya, Age 61 years, Hindu, Retired Employee, R/o Maruthinagar-I, Besides Doctor Murali Hospital, Narasannapeta, Srikakulam District.

.... Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant.

AND

• 1. Balata Adilakshmi, W/o Late Kasavavyya, Aged 75 years, Hindu, Household duties, R/o DNo. 3-18, Gavarampeta Village, Piruvada Post, Polaki Mandal, Srikakulam District.
• 2. Mojjada Kalavati, W/o Ramayana, Aged 58 years, R/o DNo 23-150, Narasannapeta, Srikakulam District.

.... Respondents

WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate Sri S SRINIVASA RAO presented this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order in I.A. No 117 of 2021 in 0.S No 51 of 2019 Dated 30.11.2022 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil. Judge, Srikakulam.

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S SRINIVASA RAO Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this CIVIL REVISION PETITION should not be admitted.

$\rightarrow$ You viz:

• 1. Balata Adilakshmi, W/o Late Kasavavyya, Household duties, R/o DNo. 3-18, Gavarampeta Village, Piruvada Post, Polaki Mandal, Srikakulam District.
• 2. Mojjada Kalavati, W/o Ramayana, R/o DNo 23-150, Narasannapeta, Srikakulam District.

are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate, as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CIVIL REVISION PETITION should not be admitted, on or before 28-03-2022 on which date the case stands posted for hearing.

The Court made the following: ORDER:

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Notice before admission.

Issue notice to respondent returnable in two weeks. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to respondent and file proof of service.

List the matter on 28.3.2022."

//TRUE COPY//

SD/- CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. $\mathsf{R}$ $\mathcal{S}$ SECTION OFFICER

$\mathsf{To},$

1. Balata Adilakshmi, W/o Late Kasavavyya, Household duties, R/o DNo. 3-18, Gavarampeta Village, Piruvada Post, Polaki Mandal, Srikakulam District.

$\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{Z}^2}$

• 2. Mojjada Kalavati, W/o Ramayana, R/o DNo 23-150, Narasannapeta, Srikakulam District. $(1 & 2$ by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)
• 3. One CC to SRI. S SRINIVASA RAO Advocate [OPUC]
• 4. One spare copy

pr

HIGH COURT

NJSJ

DATED:28/02/2022

LIST THE MATTER ON 28.03.2022

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

CRP.No.368 of 2022