K.Krishna Murthy vs. Sri. M.Hari Narayan

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble M.Ganga Rao
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:4 Mar 2021
CNR:APHC010080562021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Admission (Cc Matters)

Before:

Hon'ble M.Ganga Rao

Listed On:

1 Mar 2021

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 350 OF 2021

Between:

    1. K.Krishna Murthy, S/o. Narasimhulu.
    1. K.Mohan, S/o. K.Muni Krishnaiah.
    1. K.Charan Kumar, S/o. K.Hari Prasad.
    1. Y. Om Prasad, S/o. Y.Manohar Naidu.
    1. A.S.Hema Sai Kumar, S/o. A.E.Sridhar.

.... Petitioners

  • AND
    1. Sri. M.Hari Narayan, I.A.S., District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District, $A.P.$
    1. Sri. P.S. Girisha, I.A.S., The Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P.
    1. Sri. M.Mahesh, Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Territory Manager, S.M.Towers, Dargamitta, Nellore retail Territory, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, A.P.

.....Respondents /Respondents 2 to 4 in W.P.

Whereas the petitioner has presented under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the above case their his counsel Sri G. Tuhin Kumar, praying the High Court to punish the Contemnors/respondents herein, for their willful and intentional disobedience of the orders dated 27-08-2020 passed by the High Court in WP No. 15257 of 2019, in the interest of justice.

Whereas the said case coming on for orders as to admission on this day and whereas the High Court, upon perusing the affidavit filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Tuhin Kumar Advocate for the petitioner, directed issuance of notice before admission to the respondents herein, to show cause as to why in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, the said case should not be admitted.

Therefore, you namely;

    1. Sri. M.Hari Narayan, I.A.S., District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District, $A.P.$
    1. Sri. P.S. Girisha, I.A.S., Commissioner, The Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P.
    1. Sri. M.Mahesh, The Territory Manager, Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., S.M.Towers, Dargamitta, Nellore retail Territory, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. A.P.

be and hereby are directed to show cause, as to why the contempt case should not be admitted, either appearing in person or through Advocate, duly instructed on 25-03-2021, to which date the case stands posted for hearing, failing wherein the said case will be heard and determined ex-parte.

//TRUE COPY//

DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

SD/- M. NAGESWARA RAO

    1. The District Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and to return to this Court before 25-03-2021).
    1. The District Judge, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent No.3 to and to return to this Court before 25-03-2021).
    1. Sri. M.Hari Narayan, I.A.S., District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District, $A.P.$
    1. Sri. P.S. Girisha, I.A.S., Commissioner, The Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P.
    1. Sri. M.Mahesh, The Territory Manager, Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., S.M.Towers, Dargamitta, Nellore retail Territory, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, A.P. (Addressee Nos. 3 to 5 By RPAD – along with a copy of petition and affidavit).
    1. Two Spare copies.

$pr$

$T_0$

$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}{\mathcal{L}}(\mathcal{L})$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}{\mathcal{L}}\left(\mathcal{L}\right)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}(x) = \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}(x) \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}(x) \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}\left(\mathcal{A}\right)$

HIGH COURT

$MGR,J$

DATE: 04.03.2021

NOTE: POST ON 25-03-2021

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

CC. NO. 350 OF 2021

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(4) - 9 Jul 2021

Final Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 18 Jun 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 30 Mar 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 4 Mar 2021

Interim Order

Viewing