N.Padmamma vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Cheekati Manavendranath Roy
Listed On:
12 Mar 2020
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$[3163]$
(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH RO' CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1051 OF 2020
Between:
-
- N.Padmamma, W/o. Late Naganna, Aged 52 yrs., A2, R/o. Yerramatam Village, Kothapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.
-
- Nageswaramma, W/o. Shiva Naganna, D/o. Late Naganna, A3, Aged 34 yrs., R/o. Naglooti Village, Midthoor Mandal, Kurnool District.
-
- Nagaveni, W/o. Babuji, D/o. Late Naganna, Aged 29 yrs, A4, R/o. Yerraguntla Village, Bandi Athmakur Mandal, Kurnool District.
...Petitioners/Accused No. 2 to 4
AND
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi
-
- Priyanka Sheelam, W/o. N.AChanna, D/o. S.Prakash Rao, Aged 20 yrs., R/o. Yerramattam Village, Kothapalli Mandal, Kurnool district.
...Respondents
SD/- K Jagan Mohan DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through their Advocate Sri VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY presented this Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records and quash the Crime No. 1. of 2020 of Kothapalli Police Station, Kurnool District.
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Venkat Reddy Kodumury, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No.2 herein returnable in four weeks to show cause as to why this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted.
You viz:
Priyanka Sheelam, W/o. N.AChanna, D/o. S.Prakash Rao, R/o. Yerramattam Village, Kothapalli Mandal, Kurnool district.
are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate, as to why in the CRLP should not be admitted, on or before 16-04-2020, on which date the case stands posted for hearing.
The Court made the following: ORDER:
"Notice before admission.
Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has taken notice for respondent No.1.
Notice to respondent No.2 returnable in four weeks.
Post after four weeks."
// TRUE COPY //
$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$ $\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial \mathbf{r}}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}))$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$
$\mathcal{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}\left(\mathcal{A}\right)=\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}$
$\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}) = \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}) \times \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L})$ $\begin{array}{c}\n\bullet \ \bullet \ \bullet \ \bullet\n\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{c} \mid \ \mid \end{array}$ $\mathbb{R}^2$ $\hat{f}^{\dagger}(\vec{r})$
$\mathcal{O}(\log n)$
$\mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L}$
$\frac{d\mathcal{L}}{d\mathcal{L}} = \frac{d\mathcal{L}}{d\mathcal{L}} \frac{d\mathcal{L}}{d\mathcal{L}}$ $\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} \mid \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} }$
$\mathbf{v}^{\prime}$ $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$
-
To, Priyanka Sheelam, W/o. N.AChanna, D/o. S.Prakash Rao, R/o. Yerramattam<br>Village, Kothapalli Mandal, Kurnool district. (by RPAD- along with a copy of<br>petition and memorandum of grounds)
-
- One spare copy
-
HIGH COURT