Shaik Khaja Bee vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh

Judge:Hon'ble A V Sesha Sai

Case Status:Dismissed

Order Date:23 Feb 2022

CNR:APHC010070482022

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Get a certified copy of this order

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Sl.			OFFIC<br>E
No	DATE	ORDER
			NOTE
	23.02.2022	AVSS,J & RC,J
		Smt.B.V.Aparna<br>Lakshmi,<br>learned
		Standing Counsel,<br>takes notice for respondent
		Nos.3 and 7.
		In the present Writ Petition, petitioner
		herein, who is a retired employee in Panchayat
		Raj Department, is seeking enforcement of the
		order dated 19.02.2016, passed by the Andhra
		Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.2344
		of 2015. By way of the said order, the Tribunal,
		while setting aside the order impugned in the
		Original Application, directed the respondents to
		consider the name of the applicant for pension
		and pensionary benefits, including gratuity and
		to release the same within four (4) months, from
		the date of receipt of the order.
		Subsequently,<br>while<br>referring<br>to<br>the
		information furnished by the Chief Executive
		Officer,<br>Zilla Praja Parishad<br>and the orders of
		the<br>Government<br>vide<br>G.O.Rt.No.1797,
		Panchayat<br>Raj<br>and<br>Rural<br>Development
		Department,<br>dated 19.11.2013,<br>issued by the
		State Government, in similar circumstances, the
		Director, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development
		issued<br>letter No.671402/DPR<br>&RD/C1/2015,
		dated<br>05.03.2019.<br>In<br>the<br>said<br>letter,<br>the
		Director also specifically stated that the Chief

Executive<br>Officer<br>submitted<br>a<br>report<br>for<br>sanction of pensionary benefits, gratuity and<br>other<br>benefits<br>to<br>the<br>petitioner.<br>Subsequently, alleging willful disobedience<br>of the order passed in O.A.No.2344 of 2015, on<br>the part of the respondents, petitioner herein<br>approached<br>this<br>Court<br>by<br>way<br>of<br>filing<br>C.C.No.1717 of 2021.<br>According<br>to<br>the<br>petitioner,<br>pending<br>contempt case, the respondents herein paid a<br>sum of Rs.35,828/- in the month of December,<br>2021. It is further stated that,<br>in view of the<br>same,<br>under the impression,<br>the respondents<br>herein<br>would<br>implement<br>the<br>order<br>of<br>the<br>Tribunal, petitioner herein had withdrawn the<br>said C.C.No.1717 of 2021 on 27.01.2022.<br>According to the learned counsel for the<br>petitioner,<br>till date,<br>no sanction orders have<br>been passed by the respondents, in the direction<br>of redressing the grievance of the petitioner.









Sri<br>V.Ramesh,<br>learned<br>Government<br>Pleader<br>for<br>Services-IV<br>seeks<br>short
accommodation to get instructions.
Post after two (2) weeks.

_________<br>AVSS,J

_______
RC,J
VSL