T.Venkateswara Rao vs. The State Of Ap
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
Case Status:Dismissed
Order Date:8 Dec 2021
CNR:APHC010067472020
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Education )
Before:
Hon'ble M.Satyanarayana Murthy
Listed On:
8 Dec 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO: W.P.No.4047 of 2020
PROCEEDING SHEET
| S1.<br>No. | DATE | <b>ORDER</b> | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10$ | 08.12.2021 | $\overline{\text{MSM,J}}$<br>I.A.No.01 of 2021<br>(For being mentioned) | |
| This petition is filed under the caption | |||
| "for being mentioned" as the order in | |||
| I.A.No.02 of 2020 has been wrongly drafted | |||
| as "respondent No.5 is directed not to | |||
| alienate the properties of the petitioner" | |||
| instead of "respondent No.5 is directed not to | |||
| alienate the properties of the respondent No.5 | |||
| - institution". | |||
| As it is a typographical error, Registry | |||
| directed to substitute the<br>words<br>is | |||
| "respondent No.5 is directed not to alienate | |||
| the properties of the respondent No.5 - | |||
| institution" for the words "respondent No.5 is | |||
| directed not to alienate the properties of the | |||
| petitioner" in the order dated 24.02.2021 | |||
| passed in I.A.No.02 of 2020 and issue | |||
| amended copy afresh to both the parties. | |||
| Accordingly, the petition is ordered. | |||
| MSM,J<br>Ksp | |||
| 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ں | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search