Surasani China Venkat Ratnam vs. Indian Overseas Bank
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Rakesh Kumar , D Ramesh
Listed On:
18 Mar 2020
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISIDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
Between:
Surasani China Venkat Ratnam, S/o. Surasani Chenniah
Petitioner
AND
Indian Overseas Bank, Andhra Loyla Collage Branch, Represented by its Authorised Officer, at Loyola College Rd, Jayaprakash Nagar, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 520008 Respondent
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of the writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent to forebear from conducting the e-auction of the residential property of the Petitioner at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Floors, R.S. No 95/1, Door No 70-2-43/12, Kissan Street, Patamata, Vijayawada 520010, Krishna District, bounded on the East 12' Wide Road, South Property of O. Nage Venkata Satyanarayana, West Property of Ch. Seethanarayana, North Corporation Road
IA NO: 1 OF 2020:
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order and direct that the respondents herein to stay all further proceedings implementation and forbear from conducting the e-auction of the residential property of the Petitioner at 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Floors, R.S. No 95/1, Door No 70-2-43/12, Kissan Street, Patamata, Vijayawada 520010, Krishna District, bounded on the East 12' Wide Road, South Property of O. Nage Venkata Satyanarayana, West Property of Ch. Seethanarayana, North Corporation Road, pending disposal of WP No. 3938 of 2020 on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing and upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and order of the High Court dated 17-02-2020 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sarosh Bastawala, Advocate for the Petitioner, the Court made the following
ORDER:
The present writ petition has been listed based on the application filed by learned counsel for the petitioner, for extension of interim order.
Interim order, dated 17.02.2020, is extended till 03.04.2020.
Put up on 03.04.2020.
1-
SD/- K. TATA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
One CC to Sri Sarosh Bastawal, Advocate(OPUC) 1
Two spare copies. $\mathcal{L}$
Tvr
HIGH COURT
$\pmb{\mathsf{I}}$
RKJ & DRJ
DATED: 23-03-2020
NOTE: POST ON 03.04.2020
WP.NO. 3938 OF 2020
DIRECTION EXTENDED
$\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}\subset\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}$
$\mathcal{A}^{\mathcal{A}}$
$\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L})$
$\cdot\cdot$
$\mathbf{a}^{\dagger}$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^{1/2} \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^{1/2}$ $\sim 7\ \mathrm{erg,s}$