Sri Ramamurthy Modern Rice Mill vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble U.Durga Prasad Rao
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:10 Feb 2021
CNR:APHC010050102021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Admission

Before:

Hon'ble U.Durga Prasad Rao , J. Uma Devi

Listed On:

10 Feb 2021

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

WRIT PETITION Nos.3150, 3231, 3241 and 3243 of 2021

COMMON ORDER: (per UDPR,J)

These writ petitions are filed challenging the appellate orders passed by the 2nd respondent in confirming the assessment orders passed by the 1st respondent levying GST on the value of broken rice, bran and husk obtained by the petitioners on custom milling of the paddy.

  1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Sri K.V.J.L.N.Sastry, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax representing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3, learned Assistant Solicitor General, representing on behalf of 4th respondent and Sri P.Hema Chandra, learned standing counsel representing on behalf of 5th respondent.

  2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioners would submit that the subject matter in these writ petitions is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.45971 of 2018, dated 20.11.2020 and the same order may be passed in these writ petitions also. Learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax representing on behalf of respondents has not disputed the said fact.

  3. Following the above said order and for the reasons recorded therein, these writ petitions are also allowed and the appellate orders passed by the 2nd respondent in confirming the assessment orders

passed by the 1st respondent levying GST on the value of by-products i.e., broken rice, bran and husk treating them as part of the consideration paid to the petitioners for custom milling of the paddy, are set aside. However, it is made clear that the petitioners are liable to pay tax on sale of by-products if they are statutorily taxable.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending for consideration, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J

_______________ J.UMA DEVI, J

10.02.2021 SS