IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3220 OF 2021

Between:

T

X

*v

B. Roopa @ Achamma, W/o. B.V.Ramana Rao, Aged about ⁵⁹ years, Occ. Housewife, Rio. 495/12th Cross, A-Sector, Yelanka New Town, Bangalore -64.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. Rep. by its Principal Secretary.
• 2. The District Collector, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu District.
• 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Anantapuramu District.
• 4. The Tahsildar, Penukonda, Ananthapuramu District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue ^a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not issuing, pattedar passbook and title deeds even though the application was uploaded on 11- 11-2020 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 4th respondent to issue the pattedar passbooks and title deeds forth with. / or

lA NO: ¹ OF 2021

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*'' respondent to consider the application submitted

by the petitioner uploaded on 11-11-2020 for mutation and title deed cum epassbook forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O. MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

$\mathbf{v}_j$

APHC010049662021

[3332]

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 3220/2021

Between:

B Roopa @ Achamma

...PETITIONER

...RESPONDENT(S)

AND

State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.0 MANOHER REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following Order:

The short grievance of the petitioner is non-consideration of her application dated 11.11.2020 for mutation and issuance of E-Pattadar Passbook and Title Deed in her favor in respect of her land in an extent of Ac.5.60 cents in Survey No.109-2 of Cherlopally Village, Penukonda Mandal, Anantapuram District.

$\mathbb{Z}^{\mathbb{Z}}$

2. Heard Sri P.Sravan Kumar O.Manoher Reddy, learned counsel for the Assistant Government Pleader for respondents. learned counsel representing Sri petitioner and Sri Raghu, learned

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in elaboration to what has been stated in the affidavit submitted that for obtaining pattadar deed, petitioner made an application on 11.11.2020 considered. passbook and title as the same was not

The learned counsel for the petitioner further application was not considered on the ground that the SLP the Hon'ble Apex Court and submitted that the said is pending before now the Hon'ble Apex court has disposed of the said SLP. Even though, the said SLP has been disposed of, the respondents not considering the petitioner's application dated are 11.11.2020. It would suffice for the time being if a direction is given to the respondents concerned to consider and dispose of the petitioner's application in accordance with law in a time bound manner.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government that, he has no instructions whether the SLP is disposed of, the authorities would consider and petitioner's application in accordance with law. Pleader submitted is disposed of or not. If the SLP pass the orders on the

2

consideration of the petitioner's application for issuance of the pattdar passbook and title deeds is the grievance of the petitioner. 05. Non

The petitioner contention is that her application was kept pending as the SLP with regard to the subject property is pending before the Hon ble Apex Court. It was stated that, now the SLP is disposed of. The learned Assistant Government Pleader contended that he has no instructions regarding disposed of SLP. 06.

of the above, taking the submissions of both the learned counsel into consideration, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition, by passing the following order; 07. In view

The Tahsildar concerned is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's application dated 11.11.2020 in accordance with law by duly verifying about the pendency of the SLP, and if the SLP is disposed of, the petitioner application shall be considered in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible within ^a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as 08. to costs.

As a sequel there to, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this case, shall stands closed.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/- K. KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. The District Collector, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Anantapuramu District.

4. The Tahsildar, Penukonda, Ananthapuramu District.

5. One CC to Sri O. Manoher Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

7. Three CD Copies.

$ssb$

, in

HIGH COURT

OATED:29/10/2024

ORDER

WP.No.3220 of 2021

DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS