Chellu Siva Babu vs. The State Of Ap
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Ninala Jayasurya
Listed On:
31 Jan 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: WRIT PETITION No.2150 of 2024
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl.<br>No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2. | 31.1.2024 | NJS, J | |
| W.P. No.2150<br>of 2024 | |||
| Heard<br>Mr.Srinivas<br>Paturi,<br>learned | |||
| counsel for the petitioners. Also heard learned | |||
| Assistant<br>Government<br>Pleader<br>representing | |||
| the<br>Panchayat<br>Raj<br>Department,<br>learned | |||
| Assistant<br>Government<br>Pleader<br>representing | |||
| the Roads & Buildings Department, learned | |||
| Assistant<br>Government<br>Pleader<br>representing | |||
| the respondent No.2/District Collector, East | |||
| Godavari District at Rajamahendravaram. | |||
| Learned counsel appearing on behalf of | |||
| the respondent No.7/Cheepurugudem Gram | |||
| Panchayat<br>placed<br>a<br>copy<br>of<br>the<br>written | |||
| instructions dated 30.1.2024 received from the | |||
| Panchayat Secretary, Cheepurugudem Gram | |||
| Panchayat for perusal of this Court, wherein it | |||
| is inter alia<br>stated that the construction of | |||
| culvert<br>was<br>undertaken<br>by<br>the<br>Roads<br>& | |||
| Buildings Department. | |||
| Be that as it may.<br>As seen from the | |||
| instructions dated 30.1.2024 received from the | |||
| Executive<br>Engineer<br>(I/c),<br>R&B,<br>Kovvur/ | |||
| respondent No.6, which are placed for perusal | |||
| of<br>this<br>Court<br>by<br>the<br>learned<br>Assistant |
W.P.No.2150 of 2024
Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings Department, it would appear that there is a dispute between the Villagers with regard to construction of culvert. While one set of the Villagers state that there is a culvert in existence for the last hundred (100) years and unless a new culvert is constructed at Punthala Musalamma Temple, their houses would be affected whereas the other set of Villagers are opposing construction on the ground that if the culvert is constructed, their houses would be affected.
Be that as it may. As the petitioners have made a complaint/representation through Spandana Programme, this Court is of the considered view that the matter requires intervention by the respondent No.2/District Collector for resolving the issue. Therefore, there shall be a direction to the respondent No.2 to take immediate action on the petitioners' complaint/representation dated 22.1.2024 within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, construction of cement road shall not be proceeded with.
List the matter on 19.2.2024.
_______ NJS, J vasu