Ananda Enterprises (India) Pvt.Ltd. vs. Vasudeva Mahankali Raju

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble C.Praveen Kumar
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:14 Oct 2020
CNR:APHC010013502020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Interlocutory

Before:

Hon'ble C.Praveen Kumar , Battu Devanand

Listed On:

24 Mar 2020

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

WEDNESDAY. THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

:PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR AND

THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

IA No. 2 OF 2020 $\mathbf{IN}$ AS NO: 51 OF 2020

Between:

Ananda Enterprises (India) PVT.Ltd., Bhimavaram, Represented by its Director Uddaraju Murali Ananda Varma, S/o Krishna Prasad, Regd. Office 27-8-21/3, Sivaraopeta, Bhimavaram, Factory at Kothausalamarru, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari Dist.

Appellant/Plaintiff.

AND

Vasudeva Mahankali Raju, S/o Rama Raju, aged about 62 years, Fish Cultivation, R/o Door No. 2-65, Kommalapudi, Kruttivennu Mandal, Krishna District.

...Respondent/Defendant.

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be Pleased to extend interim order dt. 28.01.2020 passed by the Hon'ble Court in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in AS.No.51 of 2020, pending disposal of AS No. 51 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated 28-01-2020 and 25-2-2020 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Y V Anil Kumar Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Sri Dintakurthi Naga Madhavi, learned counself for the Respondent and the Court made the following.

ORDER:

"Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

No representation on behalf of Ms. Dintakurthi Naga Madhavi, learned counsel for the respondent.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and taking into consideration the prevailing circumstances the order of status quo granted earlier is extended by eight (08) weeks."

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Sd/-SUBRAHMANYA SARMA

//TRUE COPY//

Vasudeva Mahankali Raju, S/o Rama Raju, R/o Door No. 2-65, Kommalapudi,<br>Kruttivennu Mandal, Krishna District. (By RPAD) One CC to Sri. Y V Anil Kumar Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Di

  1. One spare copy

HIGH COURT

DATED:14/10/2020

ORDER

IA No. 2 OF 2020 $\overline{IN}$ AS NO: 51 OF 2020

STATUS QUO EARLIER IS EXTENDED

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(8) - 26 Jul 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(9) - 26 Jul 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 5 Jul 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 19 Apr 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 19 Apr 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 22 Mar 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 22 Feb 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 6 Jan 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 14 Oct 2020

Interim Order

Viewing